Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
mantrakshar [2021/07/09 13:44] – [CATEGORIZATION OF CHARACTERS :] brahmantra | mantrakshar [2024/08/25 15:42] () – removed brahmantra | ||
---|---|---|---|
1: | 1: | ||
- | ====== MANTRAKSHAR ====== | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | [[mantrakshar|Mantrakshar]] or [[sanskritography|Sanskritography]] is a constructed language conceived as an ideographic writing system called Semantography consisting of several hundred basic symbols, each representing a concept, which can be composed together to generate new symbols that represent new concepts. Mantrakshar differ from most of the world' | ||
- | |||
- | An ideogram or ideograph (from Greek ἰδέα idéa " | ||
- | |||
- | [[mantrakshar|Mantrakshar]] was created by Dr.Anupam Nirvikar in 2017 and It is designed to express deeper levels of human cognition briefly yet overtly and clearly, particularly with regard to human categorization | ||
- | |||
- | The name " | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== History ====== | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Influences ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Mantrakshar evolved over years as a linguistic experiment beyond Indo-European languages in response to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and Charles J. Fillmore’s case grammar into "a complex, intricate array of interwoven grammatical concepts" | ||
- | |||
- | Mantrakshar was heavily inspired by cognitive linguists including George Lakoff, Ronald Langacker, Gilles Fauconnier, | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== Semantics ==== | ||
- | |||
- | Another vital referent is Leibniz’s project of an ideographic language called " | ||
- | |||
- | ==== Based on the Principles of chinese characters ==== | ||
- | |||
- | Chinese characters represent words of the language using several strategies. A few characters, including some of the most commonly used, were originally pictograms, which depicted the objects denoted, or ideograms, in which meaning was expressed iconically. The vast majority were written using the rebus principle, in which a character for a similarly sounding word was either simply borrowed or (more commonly) extended with a disambiguating semantic marker to form a phono-semantic compound character. | ||
- | |||
- | The traditional six-fold classification (liùshū 六书 / 六書 "six writings" | ||
- | |||
- | **Pictograms** | ||
- | 象形字 xiàngxíngzì | ||
- | Pictograms are highly stylized and simplified pictures of material objects. Examples of pictograms include 日 rì for " | ||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | Pictograms are primary characters in the sense that they, along with ideograms (indicative characters i.e. symbols), are the building blocks of associative compound characters (会意字/ | ||
- | |||
- | Over time pictograms were increasingly standardized, | ||
- | |||
- | **Simple ideograms** | ||
- | 指事字 zhǐshìzì | ||
- | Also called simple indicatives, | ||
- | {{:: | ||
- | |||
- | **Compound ideographs** | ||
- | 会意字 / 會意字 huìyìzì | ||
- | Also translated as logical aggregates or associative idea characters, these characters have been interpreted as combining two or more pictographic or ideographic characters to suggest a third meaning. The canonical example is 明 bright. 明 is the association of the two brightest objects in the sky the sun 日 and moon 月, brought together to express the idea of " | ||
- | |||
- | Xu Shen placed approximately 13% of characters in this category, but many of his examples are now believed to be phono-semantic compounds whose origin has been obscured by subsequent changes in their form.[25] Peter Boodberg and William Boltz go so far as to deny that any of the compound characters devised in ancient times were of this type, maintaining that now-lost " | ||
- | |||
- | In contrast, associative compound characters are common among characters coined in Japan. Also, a few characters coined in China in modern times, such as 鉑 platinum, "white metal" (see chemical elements in East Asian languages) belong to this category. | ||
- | |||
- | **Rebus** | ||
- | 假借字 jiǎjièzì | ||
- | Also called borrowings or phonetic loan characters, the rebus category covers cases where an existing character is used to represent an unrelated word with similar or identical pronunciation; | ||
- | |||
- | Rebus was pivotal in the history of writing in China insofar as it represented the stage at which logographic writing could become purely phonetic (phonographic). Chinese characters used purely for their sound values are attested in the Spring and Autumn and Warring States period manuscripts, | ||
- | |||
- | **Phonetical usage for foreign words** | ||
- | Chinese characters are used rebus-like and exclusively for their phonetic value when transcribing words of foreign origin, such as ancient Buddhist terms or modern foreign names. For example, the word for the country " | ||
- | |||
- | **Phono-semantic compounds** | ||
- | 形声字 / 形聲字 Mandarin: xíngshēngzì | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Structures of compounds, with red marked positions of radicals | ||
- | Semantic-phonetic compounds or pictophonetic compounds are by far the most numerous characters. These characters are composed of at least two parts. The semantic component suggests the general meaning of the compound character. The phonetic component suggests the pronunciation of the compound character. In most cases the semantic indicator is also the 部首 radical under which the character is listed in dictionaries. Because Chinese is replete in homophones phonetic elements may also carry semantic content. In some rare examples phono-semantic characters may also convey pictorial content. Each Chinese character is an attempt to combine sound, image, and idea in a mutually reinforcing fashion. | ||
- | |||
- | Examples of phono-semantic characters include 河 hé " | ||
- | |||
- | In general, phonetic components do not determine the exact pronunciation of a character, but only give a clue as to its pronunciation. While some characters take the exact pronunciation of their phonetic component, others take only the initial or final sounds.[33] In fact, some characters' | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== GRAMMAR ==== | ||
- | |||
- | The grammar of Blissymbols is based on a certain interpretation of nature, dividing it into matter (material things), energy (actions), and human values (mental evaluations). In an ordinary language, these would give place respectively to nouns, verbs, and adjectives. In Blissymbols, | ||
- | |||
- | The main manifestations of our world can be classified into matter, energy, and...mind force. Matter is symbolised by a square to indicate that the structure of matter is not chaotic...The symbol for energy indicates...the primeval [first age] action of our planet, the throwing-up of volcano cones...The symbol for human evaluation...suggests a cone standing on its point, a position which in physics is termed labile [likely to fall, unstable]....All words relating to things and actions refer to something real, which exists outside of our brain. But human evaluations...depend upon the mind of each individual. | ||
- | |||
- | HORIZONTAL WRITING | ||
- | |||
- | ^ first ^ second | ||
- | | क | ख | ग | घ | ||
- | | च | छ | ज | ||
- | | ट | ठ | ड | ढ | ||
- | | त | थ | द | ||
- | | प | फ | ब | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | VERTICAL WRITING OR PSEUDO DEVANAGARI | ||
- | ^ first ^ second | ||
- | | क Kafa/ | ||
- | | ख khaf | छ chet | ठ that/ | ||
- | | ग gimel/ | ||
- | | घ ghimel | ||
- | | ण nan | ञ | ड़ | ||
- | ---- | ||
- | |||
- | ^ first ^ second | ||
- | | अ alif/ | ||
- | | इ elif | ई | य yin/ | | ||
- | | उ unun | ऊ | व | ||
- | | ऋ | | र resh/ | ||
- | | लृ | ||
- | | अः | ||
- | | स shin/ | ||
- | |||
- | The words for PseudoDevanagri are derived from the Hebrew alphabets and Greek alphabets and English alphabets also have their code sounds.(Former is the Hebrew Code word while latter is the Greek [Hebrew/ | ||
- | |||
- | ===== LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR OF MANTRAKSHAR ===== | ||
- | |||
- | The Grammar of Mantrakshar varies with language ,While English has a different syntax and Hindi or other [[hindo-european|Indo-European languages]] have syntax of another type. | ||
- | |||
- | The grammar of Blissymbols is based on a certain interpretation of nature, dividing it into matter (material things), energy (actions), and human values (mental evaluations). In an ordinary language, these would give place respectively to nouns, verbs, and adjectives. The main manifestations of our world can be classified into matter, energy, and mind force. | ||
- | As opposed to Blissymbols , Mantrakshar has a unique way of representing the verbs, | ||
- | |||
- | ==== CATEGORIZATION OF CHARACTERS : ==== | ||
- | |||
- | - PICTOGRAMS | ||
- | - SIMPLE IDEOGRAMS AND RADICALS | ||
- | * PREPOSITIONS | ||
- | * ADJECTIVES | ||
- | - COMPOUND IDEOGRAMS | ||
- | - REBUS | ||
- | - IDEOPHONETIC | ||
- | ==== PARTS OF SPEECH ==== | ||
- | * [[pronoun|PRONOUN]] | ||
- | * [[noun|NOUN]] | ||
- | * [[adjective|ADJECTIVE]] | ||
- | * [[adverb|ADVERB]] | ||
- | * [[verb|VERB]] | ||
- | * [[preposition|PREPOSITION]] | ||
- | * INTERJECTION | ||
- | * CONJUNCTION | ||
- | |||
- | |||