Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
en:mantrakshar [2024/04/09 10:24] – [PART - III : CONCERNING MORPHOLOGY OF REFERENCES IN COGNITIVE STATE] brahmantra | en:mantrakshar [2024/05/29 14:43] (current) – [PART - III : CONCERNING A PHILOSOPHICAL AND SCIENTIFIC SPEECH AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH REAL AND FORMAL CHARACTERS] brahmantra | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* [[: | * [[: | ||
* [[: | * [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Seeds of Curiosity: How Science Predates Language** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Science, the methodical pursuit of knowledge through observation and experimentation, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Imagine a world without language. Early humans, facing unpredictable environments and dangerous predators, had to rely on keen observation and problem-solving skills. They noticed patterns in the movements of animals, the cycles of the sun and moon, and the connection between cause and effect. Recognizing that fire provided warmth and protection is a prime example. This wasn't mere instinct; it was a form of rudimentary scientific inquiry. Through trial and error, they learned to create and control fire, a cornerstone of human advancement. | ||
+ | |||
+ | While they couldn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The emergence of language, estimated to be around 100,000 years ago, became a turning point. Language allowed early humans to share their observations and experiences, | ||
+ | |||
+ | As civilizations arose, the need for more formalized knowledge systems grew. The ancient Egyptians and Babylonians developed sophisticated mathematics and astronomy, essential tools for agriculture, | ||
+ | |||
+ | In conclusion, science is not a recent invention but rather a culmination of human curiosity and problem-solving that predates language. Our early ancestors, through their observations and adaptations, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 11: | Line 29: | ||
Understanding reality is not a simple task because it does not depend on the view of one person but depends on how every person sees it , remembers it and then replicates or transfers it to other people. Based on view it is divided in to direct realism and indirect realism. Indirect realism is broadly equivalent to the scientific view of perception that subjects do not experience the external world as it really is, but perceive it through the lens of a conceptual framework. Indirect realism explores the visual references made by organs of action, semantics explores the references made by the organs of speech. Semiotics is closely related to this. In terms of indirect realism 1. Signified would be ( thought evoked in the mind basically an ideogram or pictogram ) , 2. Signifier ( the word or sound associated with it ) 3. Sign ( signifier + signified ) . In terms of direct Realism 1. Signified would be ( real image ) 2. signifier ( the word or sound associated with it) . 3. sign . Sometimes the signifier becomes the signified as in cases of sound acting like an ideogram or idea, for example Hindi j (ज ) has a morphology of cup representing some creation and when it is associated with other sounds it represents creation in some form. | Understanding reality is not a simple task because it does not depend on the view of one person but depends on how every person sees it , remembers it and then replicates or transfers it to other people. Based on view it is divided in to direct realism and indirect realism. Indirect realism is broadly equivalent to the scientific view of perception that subjects do not experience the external world as it really is, but perceive it through the lens of a conceptual framework. Indirect realism explores the visual references made by organs of action, semantics explores the references made by the organs of speech. Semiotics is closely related to this. In terms of indirect realism 1. Signified would be ( thought evoked in the mind basically an ideogram or pictogram ) , 2. Signifier ( the word or sound associated with it ) 3. Sign ( signifier + signified ) . In terms of direct Realism 1. Signified would be ( real image ) 2. signifier ( the word or sound associated with it) . 3. sign . Sometimes the signifier becomes the signified as in cases of sound acting like an ideogram or idea, for example Hindi j (ज ) has a morphology of cup representing some creation and when it is associated with other sounds it represents creation in some form. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== PART - III : CONCERNING A PHILOSOPHICAL AND SCIENTIFIC SPEECH AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH REAL AND FORMAL CHARACTERS | ||
+ | |||
+ | human sounds when combined with one another can act as a reference for an object of reality or a concept. Regardless of meaning and understanding one can recognize any object on the basis of reference. A person associates an object with a particular set of sounds , this set of sounds can be transferred in to other persons memory without any understanding or knowing what is the background or future of this object. This person may still be able to recognize it when it sees a similar kind of object. The study which is concerned with the sounds and their order and organization is called grammar. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Speaker' | ||
- | | + | * [[:en:phonetic_sequence|PHONETIC SEQUENCE OR ORGANIZATION]] |
* concerned with the complicated nature of understanding | * concerned with the complicated nature of understanding | ||
* A process which combines Brain with mind | * A process which combines Brain with mind | ||
Line 23: | Line 47: | ||
* [[: | * [[: | ||
* [[: | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | * referential state with reference to dimensions , space and time | ||
- | * real states are formed only from real states | ||
- | * Virtual states does not follow the same principles as real states | ||
- | * Cognitive states which are neither real nor Virtual, they do not exist in reality but only on paper and mind | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== PART - III : CONCERNING MORPHOLOGY OF REFERENCES IN COGNITIVE STATE ===== | ||
- | |||
- | human sounds when combined with one another can act as a reference for an object of reality or a concept. Regardless of meaning and understanding one can recognize any object on the basis of reference. A person associates an object with a particular set of sounds , this set of sounds can be transferred in to other persons memory without any understanding or knowing what is the background or future of this object. This person may still be able to recognize it when it sees a similar kind of object. The study which is concerned with the sounds and their order and organization is called grammar. | ||
- | |||
- | Speaker' | ||
- | |||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * LINGUISTIC SPACE CONFINED TO A 2D SPACE CALLED PAPER OR VIRTUAL PAPER | ||
- | * More general | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * More specific | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * References forming memorizable patterns from strokes in cognitive states or on paper | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * set of sounds with an inherent meaning | ||
- | * these sensible references are compounded in to abstract forms which exist either in mind or on paper , are categorized as | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * smaller | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * larger | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * the mind organizes them in an expressible but referential format called | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * LINGUISTIC EXPRESSIONS | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | * [[: | ||
- | |||
Line 134: | Line 105: | ||
* [[: | * [[: | ||
* [[: | * [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== CONCERNING MANTRAKSHAR ; AN ALPHABET OF HUMAN THOUGHT ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Mantrakshar | ||
+ | * Representations | ||
+ | * [[: | ||
+ | * [[: | ||
+ | * dimensional differences | ||
+ | * Art of combinations | ||
+ | * [[: | ||