Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
en:mantrakshar [2024/04/04 13:24] – brahmantraen:mantrakshar [2024/05/29 14:43] (current) – [PART - III : CONCERNING A PHILOSOPHICAL AND SCIENTIFIC SPEECH AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH REAL AND FORMAL CHARACTERS] brahmantra
Line 8: Line 8:
  
  
-===== PART II : CONCERNING KNOWLEDGE , REALITTY AND RELATIONS BETWEEN THEM    =====+**Seeds of Curiosity: How Science Predates Language**
  
-Understanding reality is not a simple task because it does not depend on the view of one person but depends on how every person sees it , remembers it and then replicates or transfers it to other people. Based on view it is divided in to direct realism and indirect realism. Indirect realism is broadly equivalent to the scientific view of perception that subjects do not experience the external world as it really is, but perceive it through the lens of a conceptual framework. Indirect realism explores the visual references made by organs of action, semantics explores the references made by the organs of speech. Semiotics is closely related to this. In terms of indirect realism 1. Signified would be ( thought evoked in the mind basically an ideogram or pictogram ) , 2. Signifier ( the word or sound associated with it ) 3. Sign ( signifier + signified ) . In terms of direct Realism 1. Signified would be ( real image ) 2. signifier ( the word or sound associated with it) . 3. sign .  Sometimes the signifier becomes the signified as in cases of sound acting like an ideogram or idea, for example Hindi j (ज ) has a morphology of cup representing some creation and when it is associated with other sounds it represents creation in some form. +Science, the methodical pursuit of knowledge through observation and experimentation, might seem inherently tied to language. After all, how can we share and refine scientific ideas without complex communication? However, the roots of science extend far deeper, long before the first words were spoken. Our early ancestors, driven by curiosity and the need to survive, laid the foundation for scientific thinking even before they could articulate it.
  
 +Imagine a world without language. Early humans, facing unpredictable environments and dangerous predators, had to rely on keen observation and problem-solving skills. They noticed patterns in the movements of animals, the cycles of the sun and moon, and the connection between cause and effect. Recognizing that fire provided warmth and protection is a prime example. This wasn't mere instinct; it was a form of rudimentary scientific inquiry. Through trial and error, they learned to create and control fire, a cornerstone of human advancement.
  
-  * [[:en:abstract_differences | Concerning ambiguity  ]]  +While they couldn't explain these observations with scientific vocabulary, they were actively using the scientific method in its most basic form: observing, questioning, experimenting, and drawing conclusions. The development of tools like sharpened sticks and rudimentary shelters further demonstrates this early problem-solving and adaptation. These actions, driven by the need to survive and thrive, were the seeds from which science would eventually blossom.
-  * [[:en:ars_combinatoria|The art of Combinations ]] +
-    * [[:en:organization | Organization ]] +
-   * concerned with the complicated nature of understanding  +
-     * A process which combines Brain with mind  +
-       * STUDY  +
-         * [[:en:natural_sciences | Natural Sciences ]] +
-         * [[:en:formal_sciences | Formal Sciences ]]  +
-         * [[:en:social_sciences | Social Sciences ]]+
  
 +The emergence of language, estimated to be around 100,000 years ago, became a turning point. Language allowed early humans to share their observations and experiences, fostering collective knowledge.  They could now discuss the effectiveness of different hunting strategies, describe the properties of plants, and pass down wisdom to future generations. This collaboration accelerated scientific progress.  Cave paintings, believed to be a form of communication, might even represent early attempts to document observations about animals and the environment.
  
 +As civilizations arose, the need for more formalized knowledge systems grew. The ancient Egyptians and Babylonians developed sophisticated mathematics and astronomy, essential tools for agriculture, construction, and navigation. These early scientific endeavors, though not conducted with the rigorous methodology of modern science, established a foundation of quantitative reasoning and a desire to understand the natural world.
  
-        * referential state with reference to dimensions , space and time  +In conclusion, science is not a recent invention but rather a culmination of human curiosity and problem-solving that predates language. Our early ancestors, through their observations and adaptations, laid the groundwork for scientific thinking. Language then became a powerful tool for sharing and refining this knowledge, propelling scientific progress forward. While the methods and terminology have evolved dramatically, the core human drive to understand and interact with the world around us has always been there, a testament to the enduring spirit of scientific inquiry.
-          * real states are formed only from real states  +
-          * Virtual states does not follow the same principles as real states  +
-          * Cognitive states which are neither real nor Virtual, they do not exist in reality but only on paper and mind +
  
  
-===== PART - III  : CONCERNING MORPHOLOGY OF REFERENCES IN COGNITIVE STATE =====+ 
 + 
 + 
 +===== PART II : CONCERNING KNOWLEDGE , REALITTY AND RELATIONS BETWEEN THEM    ===== 
 + 
 +Understanding reality is not a simple task because it does not depend on the view of one person but depends on how every person sees it , remembers it and then replicates or transfers it to other people. Based on view it is divided in to direct realism and indirect realism. Indirect realism is broadly equivalent to the scientific view of perception that subjects do not experience the external world as it really is, but perceive it through the lens of a conceptual framework. Indirect realism explores the visual references made by organs of action, semantics explores the references made by the organs of speech. Semiotics is closely related to this. In terms of indirect realism 1. Signified would be ( thought evoked in the mind basically an ideogram or pictogram ) , 2. Signifier ( the word or sound associated with it ) 3. Sign ( signifier + signified ) . In terms of direct Realism 1. Signified would be ( real image ) 2. signifier ( the word or sound associated with it) . 3. sign .  Sometimes the signifier becomes the signified as in cases of sound acting like an ideogram or idea, for example Hindi j (ज ) has a morphology of cup representing some creation and when it is associated with other sounds it represents creation in some form.  
 + 
 +===== PART - III  : CONCERNING A PHILOSOPHICAL AND SCIENTIFIC SPEECH AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH REAL AND FORMAL CHARACTERS  =====
  
 human sounds when combined with one another can act as a reference for an object of reality or a concept. Regardless of meaning and understanding one can recognize any object on the basis of reference. A person associates an object with a particular set of sounds , this set of sounds can be transferred in to other persons memory without any understanding or knowing what is the background or future of this object. This person may still be able to recognize it when it sees a similar kind of object. The study which is concerned with the sounds and their order and organization is called grammar.  human sounds when combined with one another can act as a reference for an object of reality or a concept. Regardless of meaning and understanding one can recognize any object on the basis of reference. A person associates an object with a particular set of sounds , this set of sounds can be transferred in to other persons memory without any understanding or knowing what is the background or future of this object. This person may still be able to recognize it when it sees a similar kind of object. The study which is concerned with the sounds and their order and organization is called grammar. 
Line 37: Line 36:
 Speaker's point of view of any object with respect to space and time. The speaker considers himself to be a part of space and time continuum in which he is standing at a certain place of location which are defined by terms using what we call "preposition" and he considers himself to be a similitude of reality which are abstractly and separately considered as "pronouns" but the reality of it is considered as a unique concept called "noun" which are described with the help of so called "adjectives". Until now it is clear the subject has been standing still , speaking only about the locations and nouns , but now he starts to move and perform actions relative to space and time. These actions are explained by the speaker in relation to time , and the manner of how it was done is explained by adverbs.    Speaker's point of view of any object with respect to space and time. The speaker considers himself to be a part of space and time continuum in which he is standing at a certain place of location which are defined by terms using what we call "preposition" and he considers himself to be a similitude of reality which are abstractly and separately considered as "pronouns" but the reality of it is considered as a unique concept called "noun" which are described with the help of so called "adjectives". Until now it is clear the subject has been standing still , speaking only about the locations and nouns , but now he starts to move and perform actions relative to space and time. These actions are explained by the speaker in relation to time , and the manner of how it was done is explained by adverbs.   
  
-  * [[:en:language_organization|Language organization]] 
-    * LINGUISTIC SPACE CONFINED TO A 2D SPACE CALLED PAPER OR VIRTUAL PAPER 
-      * More general  
-        * [[:en:hypothetical_grammar | HYPOTHETICAL GRAMMAR ]] 
-          * [[:en:grammar_types | TYPES OF GRAMMAR  ]]   
-          * [[:en:grammatical_particles | GRAMMAR PARTICLES  ]]     
-      * More specific  
-        * [[:en:language|LANGUAGE]] 
-        * [[:en:hypothetical_language | CONCERNING REAL IDEOGRAPHIC CHARECTER]] 
-      * References forming memorizable patterns from strokes in cognitive states or on paper  
-        * [[:en:sensible_references | sensible references ]] , a sensible form which represents 
-          * [[:en:language_unit |Units of language]] 
-            * [[:en:spoken_sounds | spoken sounds called phones ]] 
-            * [[:en:written_strokes | Written strokes ]] 
-               * [[:en:alphabets | alphabets or Indexing sounds  ]] , indexing based on order of alphabets or its reading order 
-               * [[:en:strokes | strokes ]]   
-                 * [[:en:index_semantograms | Indexing component or Indexing Semantograms ]] , indexing based on class  
-                 * [[:en:index_strokes | index strokes ]] , indexing based on dimensions 
-                 * [[:en:index_numbers | index numbers ]]      
-        * these sensible references are compounded in to abstract forms which exist either in mind or on paper , are categorized as  
-          * [[:en:linguistic_compounds | linguistic compounds ]] compound forms which form Integral compounds  
-            * smaller  
-              * [[:en:inflection|INFLECTIONS]] 
-            * larger  
-              * [[:en:word|WORD]] 
-              * [[:en:semantogram|COMPOUND SEMANTOGRAM]] 
-        * the mind organizes them in an expressible but referential format called  
-          * [[:en:semantographic_sentences|SEMANTOGRAPHIC SYNTAX]] 
-            * [[:en:semantic_expressions|SEMANTIC EXPRESSIONS]] 
-          * [[:en:linguistic_chain | linguistic chain ]] the so called order  
-            * LINGUISTIC EXPRESSIONS  
-             * [[:en:syntax | GRAMMAR SYNTAX ]]  
-             * [[:en:orthography | ORTHOGRAPHY ]]  
  
 +   * [[:en:phonetic_sequence|PHONETIC SEQUENCE OR ORGANIZATION]]
 +   * concerned with the complicated nature of understanding 
 +     * A process which combines Brain with mind 
 +       * [[:en:science | STUDY OR SCIENCE ]]
 +         * [[:en:natural_sciences | Natural Sciences ]]
 +         * [[:en:formal_sciences | Formal Sciences ]] 
 +         * [[:en:social_sciences | Social Sciences ]]
 +      * With the purpose to 
 +         * [[:en:ars_judicandi|ARS JUDICANDI]]
 +         * [[:en:ars_inveniendi   | Ars inveniendi ]] 
  
  
Line 129: Line 105:
   * [[:en:simpe_hindi | Simple hindi or hinglish ]]   * [[:en:simpe_hindi | Simple hindi or hinglish ]]
   * [[:en:ambiguous_terms | Ambiguous terminology ]]    * [[:en:ambiguous_terms | Ambiguous terminology ]] 
 +
 +
 +===== CONCERNING MANTRAKSHAR ; AN ALPHABET OF HUMAN THOUGHT =====
 +
 +  * Mantrakshar
 +    * Representations 
 +      * [[:en:mantrakshar_semantograms|MANTRAKSHAR SEMANTOGRAMS]]
 +        * [[:en:index_semantograms | Indexing component or Indexing Semantograms ]]
 +          * dimensional differences 
 +      * Art of combinations 
 +    * [[:en:mantrakshar_coding | Mantrakshar coding ]]
  

Trace:

QR Code
QR Code en:mantrakshar (generated for current page)